Health care evaluation, utilitarianism and distortionary taxes.

نویسنده

  • P Calcott
چکیده

Cost Utility Analysis (CUA) and Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) are methods to evaluate allocations of health care resources. Problems are raised for both methods when income taxes do not meet the first best optimum. This paper explores the implications of three ways that taxes may fall short of this ideal. First, taxes may be distortionary. Second, they may be designed and administered without reference to information that is used by providers of health care. Finally, the share of tax revenue that is devoted to health care may be suboptimal. The two methods are amended to account for these factors.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

On the Efficiency of Public and Private Health Care Systems: An Application to Alternative Health Policies in the United Kingdom

Health policy will be a major issue in Britain’s next general election. The Labour government is committed to a substantial increase in funds for the National Health Service (NHS) and has eliminated tax relief for private health insurance. The Conservative Opposition party favors subsidizing private health insurance, though it has pledged to match the government’s funding increases for the NHS....

متن کامل

The Double Dividend Hypothesis for Iran Economy: Modeling Carbon Taxes with a CGE Model

The Double dividend hypothesis briefly demonstrates that by replacing different kinds of distortionary taxes with environmental ones, not only the lesser pollutants would be emitted (the first merit), but the more productivity and public welfare would be gained (the second one). Given the urgent need of reducing emissions in Iran, levying taxes on carbon, aimed at reducing carbon dioxide by 12 ...

متن کامل

Distortionary, Non-Distortionary, and Distributional Properties of Environmental Taxes: Extension of Sandmo’s Observation

We find a limited parallel between lump-sum taxes and environmental taxes. Corollary 2, which extends Sandmo’s observation, shows that appropriated corrective revenues have the same non-distortionary effects as lump-sum taxes, the result reducing to the original observation when the appropriated corrective revenues meet the revenue need and achieve first-best efficiency with other taxes set at ...

متن کامل

The Double Dividend Hypothesis for Iran Economy: Modeling Carbon Taxes with a CGE Model

The Double dividend hypothesis briefly demonstrates that by replacing different kinds of distortionary taxes with environmental ones, not only the lesser pollutants would be emitted (the first merit), but the more productivity and public welfare would be gained (the second one). Given the urgent need of reducing emissions in Iran, levying taxes on carbon, aimed at reducing carbon dioxide by 12 ...

متن کامل

How to Internalize Pollution Externalities Through 'Excess Burdening' Taxes

Taxes are usually called distortionary if they are not lump-sum (Ballard and Fullerton 1992). It is well known that if distortionary taxes are introduced in a formerly Pareto efficient perfectly competitive economy they induce an excess burden on the economy. But suppose, the economy is subject to pollution that renders the competitive allocation inefficient in the absence of any taxes. Then it...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of health economics

دوره 19 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000